[charliehouse]

First of all, you are not my first grade teacher in spelling.

Second, this is not a SPELLING FORUM. This foroom das nat heb a ISPELING TSEK..so I will make all the mistake I want, and there is not a darn thing you can do about it.

Third, my ISPELING is highly irrelevant to the point I am making.

So why not just focus on the ISSUES at hand.


Oh did I really hurt you that much? Mukha yatang na touch ka. Btw my spelling check itong forums di mo lang siguro alam kung pano gamitin.

Precisely! to talk about physics without the gist of it terms would be ridiculous. Kung sa spelling pa nga eh supalpal na how much more sa concepts?


If you "know that" olreydi (pardon my ispelin)...then why are you meyking isteyments such as dis:

"Yet it doesn't tantamount that QM is trying to reconcile to general relativity...."
Charlie post.

Becows eep you know it olreydi...den you will know dat the Mathematics of General Relativity DAS NAT WORK when aflyd to da berri ismol.

So where does that leave da Pisisists?

Do they just leave that inconistency as it is?

Just because General Relativity does not apply to the micro scale does not mean that we have to reconcile such to micro scale. Apparently there is no need for such reconciliation . Physicist are only trying to connect the two just for the sake of knowledge.

Cool!! You answered it.

Now here comes my next kweystyon:

If the Universe..Space-Time is Finite, then as you surmise the Universe from the begining of the Big Bang...what is the "shape" of the Expanding Universe?

And....where is the "so-called" FOLDS in Space-Time?

No one has ever reach the ends of the universe, for the universe expands one planck at a time. the folds in space and time which I am referring to is not like the CM that you repeatedly assert, it is found in the fifth dimension in string theory.



Yung tanong ko pakisagot nga.:rolleyes

Teka Ikaw lang ba ang may karapatang magtanong? Eh yung tanong ko di mo nga masagot.

See my reply in italicized form.